Manatee Holdings Ltd. · sustainableaquaculture.ca · Courtenay, British Columbia

Sustainability Report

2025

Premium BC Shellfish. Measured environmental performance. Three generations of ocean experience.

This report presents the results of Manatee Holdings' 2025 independent lifecycle assessment (LCA) of geoduck production, conducted by Blue Food Performance. It provides transparent, evidence-based disclosure of our environmental footprint and our roadmap for continuous improvement.

LCA AssessorBlue Food Performance
StandardISO 14040/44
MethodEF 3.0
BoundaryCradle-to-gate
DateAugust 2025

Our Commitment

Our Commitment

Manatee Holdings Ltd. was founded in 1988 on a simple principle: produce premium shellfish using methods that work with nature, not against it. Three generations later, that principle has become a measurable commitment. In 2025, we commissioned Blue Food Performance to conduct an independent lifecycle assessment of our geoduck operations — the first of our species to undergo this verification. This report presents those results honestly, with full methodology disclosure and a clear roadmap for improvement.

Three Pillars of Our Approach

Transparency

We publish our LCA results in full — methodology, boundary, assessor, date and limitations — so buyers, investors, and partners can evaluate our claims with confidence.

Continuous Improvement

Our LCA identified on-site energy use as the primary driver of environmental impact. We have a concrete roadmap to reduce our geoduck carbon footprint from 0.16 to ~0.09 lbs CO₂eq/lb geoduck through renewable energy transition by 2027.

Honest Scope

This LCA covers geoduck production only. We are planning equivalent assessments for our oyster and clam operations in 2026–2027. We do not claim results beyond what the data supports.

Why It Matters

Why Shellfish Aquaculture Has a Distinct Environmental Profile

No External Feed

Geoduck, oysters, and clams are filter feeders. They draw nutrients directly from seawater — no feed production, no feed transport.

Low Land Use

Geoduck farming uses licensed marine areas that do not compete with terrestrial food production. Physical area: ~435 sq ft per 2,205 lbs produced.

Carbon in Shells

Shellfish sequester atmospheric CO₂ in calcium carbonate shells. Our LCA credits ~0.77 lbs CO₂/2,205 lbs geoduck when shells are permanently stored.

Water Quality

Filter-feeding removes excess nutrients from coastal waters during the grow-out period, contributing positively to the local marine environment.

Environmental benefits depend on specific production methods, location, and management practices.

Per 2,205 lbs (1 tonne) Geoduck

Lifecycle Assessment Results

Assessor: Blue Food Performance · Standard: ISO 14040/44 · Method: EF 3.0 · Boundary: Cradle-to-gate · Date: August 2025

Results by Impact Category

783 lbs CO₂eq
Climate Change
355 kg CO₂eq/tonne

GHG impact of producing 2,205 lbs (1 tonne) of geoduck, cradle-to-gate. Includes credit for ~0.77 lbs CO₂ sequestered in shells when permanently stored. Equivalent to 0.16 lbs CO₂eq per 1 lb of geoduck.

49.7 lbs H-eq
Acidification
22.56 mol H-eq/tonne

Potential contribution to acidifying emissions across the assessed lifecycle stages. Primary driver is on-site energy use. Renewable energy transition (planned 2026) is the key mitigation pathway.

8.4 lbs N eq
Marine Eutrophication
3.8 kg N eq/tonne

Potential contribution to marine nutrient enrichment. Geoduck require no external feed, which significantly limits this impact compared to fed aquaculture species.

344 gal depriv.
Water Use
156 m³ deprivation/tonne

Scarcity-weighted freshwater use across the production system (156 m³ = ~41,200 US gal). Primarily driven by on-site energy consumption rather than direct water withdrawal.

4,671 sq ft
Land Use
960 m²/tonne physical area

Physical marine area required to produce 2,205 lbs of geoduck. Does not compete with terrestrial food production. Also expressed as 55,404 pts/tonne (ReCiPe endpoint) using a different weighting.

Carbon Footprint in Context

lbs CO₂eq per lb of protein produced

Sourcelbs CO₂eq / lb
Beef (avg)~43.5
Chicken6.9
Farmed Salmon3.6
Manatee Geoduck0.36

Sources: Blue Food Performance LCA (August 2025); Poore & Nemecek (2018), Science. lbs CO₂eq/lb = kg CO₂eq/tonne ÷ 1000. Comparisons are indicative.

These results are specific to Manatee Holdings' geoduck production and should not be generalised to all Manatee products or all shellfish species.

What's Next

Continuous Improvement Roadmap

Our LCA identified on-site energy use as the primary driver of environmental impact. We are implementing the following initiatives across all species operations.

Q2 2026

Renewable Heating

Replace propane with electric heat pumps across hatchery operations.

Q3 2026

Equipment Electrification

Transition diesel-powered field equipment to electric alternatives where feasible.

Q4 2026

On-Site Solar

Install solar panels for auxiliary power at the hatchery facility.

Q1 2027

Shell Waste Program

Implement permanent shell storage program to maximise carbon sequestration credit.

2026–2027

Oyster & Clam LCA

Commission independent lifecycle assessments for oyster and Manila clam operations.

Projected Outcome

Renewable energy transition could reduce geoduck carbon footprint from 783 lbs CO₂eq → ~440 lbs CO₂eq per 2,205 lbs geoduck.

Sustainability Disclosure

Environmental performance data in this report is based on Manatee Holdings' 2025 geoduck lifecycle assessment conducted by Blue Food Performance. Results apply to geoduck production only and use a cradle-to-gate boundary. The data does not constitute certification of 'sustainable' status and should not be generalised to all species, all production methods, or all lifecycle stages. Full methodology, assumptions, and raw data are available upon request.

To request the full LCA report, methodology documentation, or energy transition plans: team@manateeholdings.com · sustainableaquaculture.ca

© 2025 Manatee Holdings Ltd. · Courtenay, British Columbia, Canada · sustainableaquaculture.ca